Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy (DALTCP) RESEARCH PROJECTS
This section describes ongoing DALTCP-funded research, as well as research completed within the past five
years. Reports produced through these projects are listed, including links to
the Abstract, Executive Summary and/or Full Report (if available online).
Remember, the Site Index section
includes an alphabetic list of keywords you can choose to find information
that is referenced throughout the DALTCP website.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct data
analyses using the 1999 National Long-Term Care Survey Informal Caregivers
Supplement (NLTCS/ICS). The data analyses will be used to revise and update the
1998 ASPE/AoA publication "Informal Caregiving:
Compassion in Action." A technical advisory group will be created to help
guide the work and will consist of noted researchers on caregiving who are
familiar with the NLTCS/ICS (e.g., Richard Schultz of the University of
Pittsburgh) and representatives of organizations whose members may be among the
target audience for the revised report (e.g., National Association of State
Units on Aging, AARP, National Family Caregivers Alliance).
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Beth Jackson, The MEDSTAT
Group, Cambridge, MA |
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct
analyses using the 1984-1999 National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) and the
Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to understand the nature of recent
declines in elderly disability rates and their implications for health care
utilization and costs. Specifically, researchers at The Urban Institute are (1)
decomposing changes in elderly disability rates using the 1984 to 1999 NLTCS
and exploring possible reasons for the decline, and (2) linking changes in
elderly disability rates to the use of specific medical procedures (e.g.,
cataract surgery, coronary and joint replacement surgeries) and/or assistive
technology. The MCBS is the primary data set for the latter analyses.
Understanding the structure of the decline will give us our first clues
as to the reasons for the overall decline, the likelihood that disability rates
will continue to fall in the future, and its potential impact on health care
spending. Current hypotheses for the decline include improvements in nutrition
(including advances in food preparation and storage over the century),
healthier life-styles (higher levels of physical activity, lower levels of
drinking and smoking), better treatment of chronic diseases through medical
procedures and pharmaceuticals, and use of assistive devices and technology. It
is likely that future improvements in disability and changes in health care
utilization and spending will be heavily dependent on which of these hypotheses
is correct. For example, if declines in disability rates are due primarily to
improvements in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) or equipment
use and reflect environmental changes rather than improvements in the intrinsic
health of the elderly population, then the declines observed over the last
decade may not continue into the next century and may have limited impact on
acute health care spending. This project is a first step in understanding the
policy implications of the changes that we are observing in elderly disability
rates.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brenda Spillman, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2002 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Changes in Elderly Disability Rates and the Implications for Health Care Utilization and Cost AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version from contractor |
PURPOSE: There are four main questions to be addressed
in this project: (1) How do characteristics (both individual and environmental)
of elderly persons residing in institutional settings differ from those
residing in community-based settings? (2) How do these characteristics
vary over time? (3) Are there differences in these characteristics between
subgroups of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly? (4)
What is the relationship between selected individual and environmental
factors and the transition of the elderly between community and institutional
residential settings? Data from six years of the Medicare Current Beneficiary
Survey will be used to answer these questions. Understanding residential
transitions will help staff in the Department improve surveys that monitor
acute health and long-term care use in different settings (e.g., the Medical
Expenditure Panel Survey) and address outstanding long-term care policy
issues (e.g., allocation of resources between community and institutional
settings).
| CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
| PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Korbin Liu, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
| COMPLETION DATE |
March 2002 |
| REPORT
AVAILABLE |
Trends in Residential Long Term Care: Use of Nursing Homes and Assisted Living and Characteristics of Facilities and Residents
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Full Report awaiting final review |
PURPOSE: This research had two components. First, a
survey of employers offering their employees long-term care insurance benefits
was conducted. This survey identified the existing group market and how it
functions. Because most of the long-term care insurance market is composed of
individual products--and because much of the employer information on long-term
care insurance is fairly recent and not well explored--not much is known about
the benefit packages, price, or design of these group products. The goal here
was to identify quantitatively the "best practices" in the industry. The second part of this
contract concerned the design of possible long-term care insurance benefits for
federal employees (and presumably their spouses, parents and retirees as well).
To do this, the contractor reviewed the market survey to identify important
elements of the existing employer group. They used this information, as well as
appropriate actuarial methods, to develop several long-term care insurance
coverage options for federal employees. Throughout the life of the
contract, the contractor conducted a series of informational meetings and
seminars. These seminars helped inform the primary federal policy makers (such
as the Office of Personnel Management) as to progress on this research and the
accompanying design options.
The final reports include a preliminary and then a final stand-alone report on the employer market. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The survey data indicate that,
among employers offering the product, the employer market provides greater
access to coverage than in the individual market. A majority of employers
offered less restrictive underwriting or even guarantee issue policies (i.e.,
did not require health information) during initial offerings to active
full-time employees. In addition, a majority offered coverage to at least one
group in addition to full-time active employees (i.e., parents/in-laws,
spouses, and retired employees), potentially extending the benefit well beyond
the size of the employee population.
Most of the employers surveyed usually limited the number of benefit choices. For example, a majority offered
two to four benefit amount options and a set package rather than allowing the
employee to select every option separately. Nearly all employers used a single
LTC insurer. These practices simplify the multiplicity of choices generally
related to purchasing this product.
Despite the limited choices of benefits, data from a random sample of employers suggest that the benefit
features of employer group plans generally resemble the most common
individually purchased policies. All surveyed employers offered some type of
inflation protection, Just under half of the surveyed employers offered some
type of "non-forfeiture" benefit that would provide the purchaser some level of
benefits if he or she lapses. The vast majority of plans (all but two) required
the employee to pay the entire premium.
Employee purchase rates varied considerably by employer. While over 40 percent of employers experienced
participation rates below 2 percent, 20 percent achieved participation of 10
percent or higher.
The survey also revealed that companies considered educating employees about the
benefit very important, but also challenging. When asked what they would have
improved about the insurance offering, employers (particularly those with low
participation rates) most cited education and communication during the initial
offering. Insurers corroborated this, and added that employers appeared to have
better enrollment rates when senior management was actively involved.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Lisa Alecxih, Lewin Group,
Fairfax, VA Steve Lutzky, Lewin Group,
Fairfax, VA
John Wilkin, Actuarial Research Corporation |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
June 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Preliminary Data from a Survey of Employers Offering Group Long-Term Care Insurance to Their Employees
AUTHORS: Steven Lutzky, John Corea, Lisa Alecxih, Laura Marburger and Kathlyn Wee
DATE: June 23, 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Research and Other Developments of Interest in Employer Group Long-Term Care Insurance
AUTHOR: John Cutler
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Survey of Employers Offering Group Long-Term Care Insurance to Their Employees
AUTHORS: Steven Lutzky, John Corea and Lisa Alecxih
DATE: June 20, 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The Disability Supplement to the National
Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D) was the first comprehensive survey of
disability in the United States. The survey was unique in that it focused on
several populations of persons with disabilities who are generally omitted or
under-represented in national survey efforts: children, persons with mental
retardation and other developmental disabilities, and the working-age
population. ASPE was instrumental in the design and implementation of the
survey, and this project develops a research agenda for analyzing the data. The
goal is to produce both short-term products and final reports that will inform
ongoing ASPE, Departmental, and Administration research and policy initiatives.
Several reports will be produced that address a specific set of questions in
four topical areas using the NHIS-D: welfare receipt and disability (including
chronic illness), disability and chronic illness among low income populations,
childhood disability and chronic illness, and employment and
disability.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Pamela Loprest, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Barriers to and Supports for Work Among Adults with Disabilities: Results from the NHIS-D
AUTHORS: Pamela Loprest and Elaine Maag
DATE: October 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Supportive Health Service Needs of Children with Disabilities
AUTHOR: Elaine Maag
DATE: September 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: Most experts agree that long-term care
insurance products must include both nursing home and home care benefits if
they are to be commercially acceptable. Yet private insurers as well as public
payers are concerned about their ability to control home care claims,
particularly given the potential substitution of formal home care services for
care provided by families. The purpose of this study (co-funded by the Robert
Wood Johnson Foundation) was to collect detailed information on the experience
of long-term care policy holders who have filed insurance claims to receive
home care benefits and how their formal and informal service use compares to a
comparable population of elderly persons without private insurance. Primary
data collection involved face-to-face interviews with approximately 1,700
persons (1,200 disabled insurance claimants and 500 next-of-kin of those
claimants) to collect information on functional and medical characteristics of
claimants as well as formal and informal services use. The sample of claimants
was drawn from the files of insurance companies that account for the majority
of private long-term care policies now in force. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Satisfaction with their insurance
benefits among claimants is generally very high, although it varied
systematically across the eight participating companies. Most home care
claimants and their informal caregivers felt that without the home care
benefits, the claimant would have had to enter a nursing home or other
residential care setting. Most nursing facility claimants did not believe that
availability of insurance had made a difference with respect to whether they
received care at home or in a nursing home; most had not previously used their
policies to pay for home care before entering a nursing facility. Private
long-term care insurance claimants received the same amounts of informal care
from spouses as non-insured elders with comparable disabilities (respondents in
the 1994 NLTCS), but private long-term care insurance claimants did receive
less "hands-on" assistance from adult children. Often, interviews with
claimants indicated that among the claimants' motives for purchasing private
long-term care insurance was to avoid becoming overly dependent on adult
children for assistance.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Marc Cohen, LifePlans, Inc., Boston, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Descriptive Analysis of Patterns of Informal and Formal Caregiving among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders Living in the Community
AUTHORS: LifePlans, Inc., and the Center for Health and Long-Term Care Research
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Informal Caregivers of Disabled Elders with Long-Term Care Insurance
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen, Maurice Weinrobe and Jessica Miller
DATE: January 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Informal and Formal Caregiving among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders Living in the Community
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen, Maurice Weinrobe and Jessica Miller
DATE: April 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Use of Nursing Home and Assisted Living Facilties Among Privately Insured and Non-Privately Insured Disabled Elders
AUTHOR: Marc A. Cohen and Jessica Miller
DATE: April 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This (co-sponsored by the Administration on
Aging and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) project provided funding to
develop comparative profiles of state long-term care systems so that states
could assess their progress in "balancing" public support for home and
community-based services as well as nursing home care for disabled elders. As a
companion project, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided separate funds
for States to access technical assistance or "mentoring" from other States with
more developed home and community-based/long-term care systems. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Profiles of state long-term care
systems were developed using a variety of indicators of supply and demand for
publicly-funded services as well as indicators of state spending on various
types of services per 1000 elders in the state's population and per eligible
public program beneficiary. Data used to develop the indicators were primarily
for 1996.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Robert Kane, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Rosalie Kane, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 1999 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
State LTC Profiles Report, 1996
AUTHORS: Richard C. Ladd, Robert L. Kane and Rosalie A. Kane
DATE: April 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: In an effort to encourage more states to
provide Medicaid to working individuals with disabilities, and to give states
addition options for providing Medicaid to those individuals, Congress
permitted states to expand their Medicaid programs (through a Medicaid
"buy-in") and allow people with disabilities to continue to receive Medicaid
services even if they return to work and have earnings greater than 100% of the
Federal Poverty Level. The goal of this project is to: (1) examine the early
implementation experiences of states that have opted for a Medicaid buy-in for
people with disabilities, and (2) offer technical assistance to states on
developing cost models, design features of a buy-in, as well as implementation
and administration considerations for a buy-in. The project represents a unique
opportunity to compare the design and implementation experiences of different
states, and use the information gathered to inform both state and federal
policy makers about strategies for improving systems that support the
employment of people with disabilities.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Allen Jenson, George Washington Unviersity, Washington, D.C.
Donna Folkemer, National Council on State Legislators
Bobby Silverstein, Center for the Study and Advancement of Disability Policy |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Medicaid Buy-In Programs: Case Studies of Early Implementer States
AUTHORS: Donna Folkemer, Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Medicaid Buy-In Program: Lessons Learned From Nine "Early Implementer" States
AUTHORS: Donna Folkemer, Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
Policy Frameworks for Designing Medicaid Buy-In Programs and Related State Work Incentive Initiatives
AUTHORS: Allen Jensen, Robert Silverstein, Donna Folkemer and Tara Straw
DATE: May 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to conduct
case studies of Nursing Home Transition Programs in up to eight states (with
possible additions depending on future grant awards). The programs being
evaluated were developed and implemented with funding from an ongoing grant
initiative sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE). A case
study approach is proposed for two reasons: (1) the vast differences in state
Medicaid programs, state long-term care infrastructures, and proposed nursing
home transition programs; and, (2) the small number of nursing home residents
expected to participate in the transition programs. Each case study will attempt to
determine the most significant barriers faced by nursing home residents in
returning to the community, and, to glean the relative success or failure of
the strategies used by grantees to overcome these barriers. As CMS and ASPE
intend to continue making additional grants in this area, an evaluation of
grantee activity will assist federal policy makers in further grant making, and
state policy makers in developing transition programs.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy
(Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brian Burwell, The MEDSTAT Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
February 2002 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Homecoming Project: Wisconsin's Nursing Home Transition Demonstration
AUTHORS: Steve Eiken, David Stevenson and Brian Burwell
DATE: August 21, 2002 (draft)
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
Michigan's Transitioning Persons from Nursing Homes to Community Living Program
AUTHORS: Steve Eiken, Brian Burwell and Anthony Asciutto
DATE: July 31, 2002 (draft)
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The major goals of this contract are: (1) to identify the technical assistance needs of states and other organizations interested in replicating and enhancing or developing the infrastructure needed to implement a "Cash and Counseling" model of consumer-directed long-term care services; (2) to set up a Research and Technical Assistance Center (RTAC) to be run out of Boston University that will begin to assist states interested in developing individual and family-directed home and community-bsed services using CMS's recently announced "Independence Plus" waiver templates; and (3) to develop and implement a plan for conducting research related to the development of infrastructure for consumer-directed programs.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty (Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: A number of national surveys (e.g., the
National Long-Term Care Survey, the Survey of Income and Program Participation,
the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, and the Health and Retirement
Survey/Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest-Old Survey) and other sources
have shown that recent improvements in life expectancy have been accompanied by
significant declines in the number of elderly persons with activity limitations
and/or cognitive impairments. Efforts among researchers and policy makers are
now shifting toward understanding the reasons for these declines and the
potential policy implications. Under this blanket purchase agreement, the
contractor shall provide expert advice on changes in the prevalence of
disability in the older American population and analysis of possible reasons
for these changes. Specifically, the contractor shall (1) review the current
literature on changes in elderly disability rates, (2) discuss the major
hypotheses proposed by researchers to explain declines in the prevalence of
elderly disability, and (3) review and critique the major studies and data used
to evaluate one or more of these hypotheses.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Larry Corder, Duke University, Durham, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2002 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Changes in the Prevalence of Disability in the Older American Population: Hypothesis and Evidence Final Report
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version from contractor |
PURPOSE: Caring for persons with disabilities in the
least restrictive setting is a major long-term care policy objective. It is
important to identify nursing home residents who could be discharged to the
community if appropriate home and community-based services were available. This
project will analyze data from a new source--the Minimum Data Set (MDS)--in
nine states. The MDS consists of assessments which have been conducted on all
nursing home residents in selected States as part of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) demonstration (and
starting in the summer of 1998, the data will be collected in electronic form
in all 50 States). We will learn much more about the medical conditions,
functional needs, and specific services used by nursing home residents than was
possible with previous data sets. We will also be able to study important
subpopulations, especially the nonelderly. The policy implications of the
findings will be assessed.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) Susan Nonemaker,
CMS |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Brant Fries, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI John Morris, Hebrew
Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
|
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Characteristics of Nursing Home Residents Under Age 65
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final review |
PURPOSE: This project will examine the extent to which childless elderly--who are otherwise similar to older persons with children--cost more to the Medicare program, and will identify the specific groups of services (e.g., hospital inpatient, outpatient, home health, skilled nursing, physician, hospice, etc.) that are most susceptible to differential use by elderly Medicare beneficiaries with and without children. This will allow the Department to decide whether--and how--the growth in the size of older Americans with no children would need to be accounted for in planning for the Medicare program's financial future.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan
(Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Urban Institute |
PURPOSE: Home health care services are covered in full for Medicare beneficiaries who meet a set of coverage criteria. Though most coverage criteria are straightforward, there is no operational definition to either the homebound or the medical necessity criteria that can be used uniformly by providers and intermediaries. The vagueness of these two criteria led to wide interpretations by and subsequent problems for the Fiscal Intermediaries and providers as well. The purpose of this project is to develop and test a set of uniform and reliable indicators that can be systematically used to document and monitor two Medicare home health care coverage criteria: the "Homebound" and the "Medical Necessity" criteria. The indicators will be linked to items from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) in a decision tree algorithm (or a logic model). Two decision algorithms will be developed for the two criteria. The algorithms will represent a major step toward helping providers, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and the intermediaries in administering the home health benefit. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Findings from the study show that the two OASIS algorithms successfully identify patients highly likely to meet the homebound and medical necessity criteria for Medicare home health care. Using OASIS data alone, almost 90% of the 600 patients in the sample were classified as meeting the medical necessity criterion. The figure for the homebound criterion is lower (48.5%). It is critical to note, however, that individuals may be clearly eligible for home care benefits even though they are not captured by the OASIS algorithms. Nurses who were experts in chart review, in fact, concluded that over half of the patients who were not captured by the homebound algorithm did meet the requirement based on a careful review of patients' medical records.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Hakan Aykan (Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Christopher Murtaugh, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY Sarah Donelson,
PeaceHealth, Eugene, OR |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2001 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Clarifying the Definition of Homebound and Medical Necessity Using OASIS Data: Final Report
AUTHORS: Sarah M. Donelson, Christopher M. Murtaugh, Penny Hollander Feldman, Lori Bruno, Stephanna Zeppie, Shiela Kinatukara Neder, Eva Quint, Liping Huang and Amy Clark
DATE: March 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract, Executive Summary and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to
encourage international comparative data collection. This was a follow-up to
the G8 Summit Aging Experts Meeting in May 1997. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A two-day international experts
meeting was convened by OECD in December 1999.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Peter Hicks, Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 1999 |
PURPOSE: Using the outcome measurement instrument
developed for patients suffering from a stroke (i.e., developed under the
project Medicare Post-Acute Care: Quality Measurement),
two projects have been combined to study the outcome and costs of Medicare
post-acute care services for Medicare beneficiaries who have suffered a stroke
and are discharged from acute care hospitals to skilled nursing facilities
(SNFs), rehabilitation hospitals/units (RFs), home health agencies (HHAs), or
use multiple post-acute care settings. These studies will examine in a
post-prospective payment system environment the: (1) demographic and health
related characteristics of and assess the extent of overlap in stroke patients
treated in each of the post-acute care settings; (2) patterns of service use
and costs associated with the treatment of similar patients in each setting and
across episodes of care; (3) outcomes across an episode of care for similar
Medicare beneficiaries treated by each post-acute provider type and those
treated by multiple providers; (4) relationship between outcomes for similar
patients and differences in the mix and intensity of services provided, and
level of reimbursement across post-acute care providers and episodes of care;
and (5) core measures that may be most useful to incorporate into on-going
reporting requirements to monitor outcomes in each post-acute care setting and
across episodes of care. Medicare treats post-acute care
providers (skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation hospitals, and home
health agencies) differently--in terms of payment, eligibility, coverage, and
certification--even though these providers may be becoming more similar in the
types and intensity of services they provide and in the types of patients they
serve. This differential treatment may encourage admission to more costly
settings than is necessary or the delivery of unnecessary service. It is
important to understand the extent to which post-acute providers serve patients
with similar conditions and whether the use of one type of provider or pattern
of care relative to another results in superior health outcomes and at what
cost. This policy concern becomes even more urgent in light of the
extraordinary changes now being implemented in Medicare payment policies for
post-acute care providers. Each of Medicare's post-acute care providers is or
will shortly be subject to new prospective payment systems that will differ
among provider type. Payment reforms may create incentives to reduce services
to or avoid altogether medically complex, heavy care patients. It is important
that the Department understand the impact of its payment policies on the
quality of Medicare post-acute services and beneficiary access.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |
Andy Kramer, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO George Carcagno,
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2004 |
PURPOSE: A possible explanation for the recently
observed decline in the prevalence of disability in the U.S. elderly population
is that better treatment of chronic diseases through medical procedures and
pharmaceuticals has led to an improvement in functioning in the elderly
population. Lending some credence to this hypothesis is research by Freedman
and Martin (forthcoming in the American Journal of Public Health) that
documents an increase in the prevalence of chronic health conditions such as
arthritis, diabetes, stroke and heart disease during the same period that
disability has fallen. They hypothesize that changes in the management of
chronic disease--and changes in medication use in particular--have caused
chronic health conditions to become less debilitating as their prevalence has
increased.
Drug treatment has become an increasingly important aspect of medical care for older Americans
with approximately nine out of ten older Americans currently take one or more
prescription drugs daily. During the 1980s and early 1990s there have been
major shifts in the classes of drugs prescribed for some of the more
debilitating chronic conditions. For example, for arthritis, increased
availability of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, and, for women, estrogen replacement therapy may be
associated with fewer debilitating effects. New classes of psychotropic agents
have become available to treat depression and other psychiatric conditions,
which have been identified as a major cause of premature disability among the
elderly. Drug treatments for diabetes and hypertension have also expanded
significantly during this period.
This project supplements an existing National Institute on Aging grant to Vicki Freedman of the Philadelphia Geriatric Center. Under the grant Dr. Freedman is examining the
role of changes in the use of medications in explaining aggregate changes in
functioning in the U.S. population aged 51-61. The data sets for the analyses
are the first (1992) and fourth (1998) waves of the Health and Retirement
Survey (HRS), which provide nationally representative cross-sections of the
noninstitutionalized population in this age range.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton (William.Marton@hhs.gov)
Rose Maria Li, NIA |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Vicki Freedman,
Philadelphia Geriatric Center, Philadelphia, PA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
REPORT AVAILABLE |
Contribution of Medication Use to Recent Trends
in Old-Age Functioning
AUTHORS: Vicki A. Freedman and Hakan Aykan
DATE: August 2002
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report
Abstract; Executive Summary
and Full Report |
PURPOSE: This project had two distinct foci. One was
the analysis of data from the 1994 National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) to
assist the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) actuaries in making cost
estimates of the potential effects of eliminating or redefining the requirement
that Medicare beneficiaries must be "homebound" in order to access the Medicare
home health benefit. The second was to analyze data from the Community
Caregiver Supplement to the 1996 National Medical Expenditures Survey (NMES)
Nursing Home Component. The purpose of this analysis was to understand the
factors that influenced decisions by severely disabled persons and their family
members that the severely disabled person should enter a nursing home. This
analysis will help guide the work of the CMS/ASPE Task Force on Promoting Home
and Community-Based Alternative to Nursing Home Care. In particular, the
analysis will help design the "Nurse Home Transition" grants program for the
states which ASPE and CMS plan to sponsor jointly. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Analyses of the 1994 NLTCS have
been completed. A memorandum of understanding was drafted with the Agency for
Health Care Policy Research to permit work to begin on the NMES data; however,
AHCPR was never able to complete the work that was required. Results from the NLTCS analyses
were shared with CMS staff, including the CMS Actuary's office and used to
estimate the costs associated with policy options for changing or eliminating
the Medicare HHA "homebound" requirement. These analyses served as the basis
for the Congressionally mandated report on Options for Redefining the Medicare
Homebound Requirement which CMS sent to Congress in 1999.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) Barbara Altman,
AHCPR |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Beth Jackson, The MEDSTAT
Group, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
July 2000 |
PURPOSE: The goal of this project is to develop a
conceptual framework that will guide a definition of coordination of care and
to develop corresponding measures of care coordination which can, in future
work, be field tested for validity and reliability, and become new tools to be
used by states and managed care organizations to improve their accountability
and performance.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Shoshanna Sofaer, City University of New York, New York, NY |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Coordination of Care for Persons with Disabilities Enrolled in Medicaid Managed Care: A Conceptual Framework to Guide the Development of Measures
AUTHORS: Shoshanna Sofaer, Barbara Kreling and Martha Carmel
DATE: December 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract and Full Report |
PURPOSE: The Department currently has a limited
ability to model the impacts of alternative health, long-term care and
employment related policies on the program participation of younger individuals
with disabilities and public and private costs, both in the short and long run.
For example, none of the current models were capable of generating estimates
about the cost and impact of the Kennedy-Jeffords proposal to extend Medicaid
and Medicare coverage to SSI and/or SSDI disabled adults who return to work.
The purpose of this project is to develop preliminary design options for
constructing a microsimulation model of children, working age adults and their
families. Such a model would age a sample of persons over time, keeping track
of changes in their disability status, income, education, living arrangement,
program participation, employment, health insurance status, health and
long-term care service use, including personal assistance services/equipment.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Gina Livermore, The Lewin Group, Fairfax, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2002 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to develop a user-friendly book for states, providers, and consumers: (1) examining and documenting the new directions in consumer-centered care in nursing home settings; (2) exploring real or perceived regulatory barriers to designing consumer-centered models of care; (3) documenting innovative practitioners who have implemented consumer-centered activities and programs in their nursing homes; and (4) hypothesize about what is possible in the future in the provision of consumer-centered nursing home services and supports.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank
(Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Lisa Alecxih, The Lewin
Group, Fairfax, VA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2003 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to design a national survey of direct care workers in long-term care settings in order to obtain data on the size and characteristics of this workforce. The best available data suggests that there are approximately 2 million workers in these settings. This project will: (1) design a sampling frame for a nationally representative sample of direct care workers in long-term care settings; (2) establish data collection procedures for the survey; (3) develop data collection instruments; and (4) prepare an OMB clearance package.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Andreas Frank (Andreas.Frank@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
March 2004 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to design a
research study of an admissions cohort of long-term care insurance claimants.
Claimants will be interviewed immediately upon triggering their benefits and
will be followed for approximately 18 months. This project is part of a
long-term research agenda being implemented by ASPE to better understand the
circumstances or factors that motivate elders who have purchased private
long-term care insurance benefits to file claims for benefits and how the
presence of private insurance affects decision-making about formal services use
for those who have been approved for benefits.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Pamela Doty
(Pamela.Doty@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
LifePlans, Inc., Waltham,
MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: This project is aimed at identifying key
policy and programmatic challenges for bringing housing and services together
for low-income older Americans in a way that allows some "aging in place" and
prevents unnecessary nursing home admissions. It will assist ASPE to develop a
policy and research agenda that is responsive to changing trends, to actions on
Capitol Hill, and to the desires of the Administration to ensure an array of
community supports for aging seniors.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy
(Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet O'Keeffe, Research
Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2002 |
PURPOSE: This project will support Network activities related to the development of a set of concise measures of childhood
disability. The project will capitalize on recent conceptual and methodological
developments in the demographic, social and biomedical study of disability.
Specifically, the project will use data from the 1994 and 1995 disability
supplements to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D), the 1997 National
Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the 1992 and 1993 panels of the Survey of
Income and Program Participation to develop concise measures of disabilities in
children. The method of development will use two leading conceptual models of
disability: that of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
(NCMRR) and that of the World Health Organization (WHO). The intent of these
concise measures is to provide reliable sets of indicators that are sensitive
to subgroups of children to be used in population sample surveys and
survey-based surveillance systems. The childhood disability
measures developed under this project will be used to provide a national
estimate of the number of children with disabilities that is consistent with
current conceptual models of disability. Including these measures on
Departmental survey efforts is a cost effective means for collecting
information on the prevalence of childhood disability and the characteristics
of the population. Childhood disability information is needed for several
Departmental initiatives (e.g., Healthy People 2010).
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jeffrey Evans, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2001 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Concise Measures of Childhood Limitations
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Awaiting final version |
PURPOSE: This project is a continuation of support
for Network activities related to the development of a set of concise measures
of childhood disability with the specific focus on mental health and learning
disabilities. The project will continue to capitalize on recent conceptual and
methodological developments in the demographic, social and biomedical study of
disability. Specifically, the project will use data from the 1994 and 1995
disability supplements to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-D), the
1997 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), and the 1992 and 1993 panels of
the Survey of Income and Program Participation to develop concise measures of
disabilities in children. Using a theoretically based approach, the project
will identify mental disorders and learning disabilities and their associated
disabilities in these national surveys, and develop concise measures of these
areas of disabilities in
children. The purpose of the
Interagency Agreement that supports this activity is to provide resources to
obtain consultation of two experts to guide this special aspect of the project:
an expert on child development with particular expertise in minority children
and school-age children of low birth weight; and a pediatrician who will
contribute a medical perspective on issues in age-appropriate development and
special needs school
population. The new concise
measures developed by this project are intended for inclusion on population
sample surveys and survey-based surveillance systems to monitor the prevalence
of childhood disability. The childhood disability measures developed under this
project will be used to provide a national estimate of the number of children
with disabilities that is consistent with current conceptual models of
disability. Including these measures on Departmental survey efforts is a cost
effective means for collecting information on the prevalence of childhood
disability and the characteristics of the population. Childhood disability
information is needed for several Departmental initiatives (e.g., Healthy
People 2010).
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Cille Kennedy
(Cille.Kennedy@hhs.gov) John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Jeffrey Evans, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2002 |
PURPOSE: The overall purpose of this project is to develop, pilot, and disseminate an instrument to be used in national surveys to collect assistive device and environmental information from working age adults with disabilities and older persons living in the community. The project will include an analysis of data from the pilot study, and produce a report detailing the process, pilot work, findings, and final instrument. The dissemination phase will include a meeting of the major investigators on national health and disability surveys--both government and private (e.g., National Health Interview Survey, Current Population Survey, National Long-Term Care Survey, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Health and Retirement Survey)--to present the results of the pilot study and discuss ways of appropriately incorporating all or part of the instrument in various surveys.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
William Marton
(William.Marton@hhs.gov) Hakan Aykan
(Hakan.Aykan@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Georgeanne Patmios, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project will provide improved general-purpose information about the health and well-being of the population
in the United States and document trends over time, especially for those with
disabilities and/or chronic conditions. It will provide a more complete
description of the population with disabilities than can be obtained from the
survey data alone. The project will also provide data on specific topics of
interest to ASPE (e.g., the health status of Medicare beneficiaries before they
became eligible for Medicare). In addition, it will provide information on a
number of methodological issues, such as the correspondence between administrative files and survey responses. This project will identify
significant gaps in our knowledge of persons with disabilities, and help
eliminate those gaps in future data collection efforts.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek (John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Christine Cox, National
Center for Health Statistics, Bethesda, MD |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2003 |
PURPOSE: This project adds a disability component to
an existing HCFA (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)) evaluation of Medicaid 1115 waiver demonstrations in five
states, with a focus on the Tennessee evaluation. The study will follow the
experiences of SSI disabled children and adults (physically disabled, mentally
ill, mentally retarded, or developmentally disabled) enrolled in the TennCare
and TennPartners Programs. The project will conduct in-depth qualitative
analyses of the State's experience in enrolling individuals with disabilities
into managed care systems, and will conduct quantitative analysis to examine
cost and utilization data for these populations. The supplement will also
include a survey of disabled consumers to examine issues of satisfaction,
quality, health status, and functioning.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Craig Thornton, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
December 2000 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Risk Selection Among SSI Enrollees in TennCare
AUTHORS: Steven C. Hill, Christopher Trenholm, Craig Thornton and Judith Wooldridge
DATE: February 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
SSI Enrollees in TennCare: Room for Improvement
AUTHORS: Steven S. Hill, Judith Wooldridge, Anne Ciemnecki, Karen CyBulski, Barbara Kolln, Michael Sinclair and Craig Thornton
DATE: February 15, 2001
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: HCFA's (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)) existing evaluation examines the
impact of changes in the financing and delivery of health care services to AFDC
recipients and low income persons not eligible for Medicaid in the State of
Oregon, through the 1115 waiver demonstration authority. This supplement to the
Oregon evaluation adds a disability focus. The supplement will focus on the
experiences of SSI disabled children and adults (physically disabled, mentally
ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled) enrolled in the Oregon Health
Plan. The disability supplement will examine cost and utilization data, and
link these data to functional data collected by state agencies. In addition,
the supplement will conduct a survey of consumers and providers to examine
issues of satisfaction, access, quality, health status, and functioning.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Hunter McKay (Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Janet Mitchell, Health Economics Research, Inc., Waltham, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
September 2000 |
|
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Enrolling Elderly and Disabled Beneficiaries in Medicaid Managed Care: Lessons Learned from the Oregon Health Plan
AUTHORS: Janet B. Mitchell and Paul Saucier
DATE: September 23, 1998
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
Feasibility of Matching Medicare and Medicaid Data for Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in Oregon
AUTHORS: Carol J. Ammering and Debra A. Dayhoff
DATE: September 28, 1999
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
|
The Exceptional Needs Care Coordinator in the Oregon Health Plan
AUTHORS: Edith G. Walsh, Gregory Todd French and Fred Bentley
DATE: February 7, 2000
AVAILABLE ONLINE: Report Abstract |
PURPOSE: This project, coordinated with the Health
Care Financing Administration, will develop a linked Medicare/Medicaid data
base of beneficiaries to assist in research in this population. The project
will create an integrated data base with Medicare and Medicaid data to test
risk adjustment methodologies for dually eligible beneficiaries, and conduct
studies on program interactions between Medicare and Medicaid.
|
CONTACT PERSONS |
Hunter McKay
(Hunter.Mckay@hhs.gov) William Clark,
CMS |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Sue Dodds, Mathematica
Policy Research, Princeton, NJ |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
October 2001 |
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project is to ascertain: (i) the current status of the implementation of electronic information systems in post-acute and long-term care settings; and (ii) the characteristics of and the factors that have facilitated or limited extensions of more robust electronic medical records and information systems from acute care settings into post-acute care and long-term care settings. More specifically, the project is intended to address the following research questions: - What electronic medical records and information systems are being used in acute, post-acute and long-term care?
- Which acute care health delivery systems that employ robust electronic medical records and information systems in the course of treating patients have extended electronic information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
- In selected acute care settings that have extended electronic information systems into affiliated post-acute/long-term care settings:
- What are the characteristics of the electronic information systems in both the acute, post-acute and long-term care settings? For example: What types of information are included in these systems? What messages are sent using these systems? Do these electronic systems support clinical decision making, monitoring the effectiveness of interventions, etc.? What messaging standards are used? What types of communication (e.g., one-way vs. two-way) are supported by these systems? How do these systems limit or enhance communication?
- What organizational, cultural, and technological barriers were confronted when extending electronic health information systems into post-acute/long-term care, and how were these resolved?
- What are the costs and benefits of extending such electronic health information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
- What additional electronic information systems are needed in post-acute/long-term care and what either supports or presents barriers to their implementation?
- What next steps could be pursued in extending electronic medical records and information systems into post-acute/long-term care?
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Jennie Harvell (Jennie.Harvell@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Andy Kramer, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver CO |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2004 |
PURPOSE: With Americans' increasing reliance on home and community-based services and assisted living facilities, it is critical for policy makers to monitor trends in long-term care use and the characteristics of the population outside of the traditional nursing home. Currently, there are two primary sources of comprehensive information on the living arrangements of older Americans and their use of long-term care services: the decennial Census and surveys specifically designed to collect data on the long-term care population (e.g., the National Nursing Home Survey [NNHS], the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey [MCBS], National Long-Term Care Survey [NLTCS]). Whether persons are classified as residing in an institution or not is greatly dependent on how the sampling frame is constructed (in the case for surveys) and/or how person's living arrangements are determined. Unfortunately, the census and surveys frequently use different data collection methods and approaches to categorizing living arrangements and long-term care service use. As a result, estimates of the number of persons in certain residential settings vary widely. For example, based on the 1996 MCBS, the number of older Americans living in assisted living facilities is approximately 420,000; however, the corresponding estimate from the 1999 NLTCS is nearly twice as high (810,000). Working with the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics, DALTCP staff will conduct a series of analyses of the most recent data to estimate and interpret variations in the size and characteristics of the long-term care population in different residential settings.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
John Drabek
(John.Drabek@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Brenda Spillman, Urban Institute, Washington, DC |
PURPOSE: From 1989 to 1992, there was a 210%
increase in Medicare expenditures for home health services. This increase in
utilization has generated widespread policy interest in appropriate measures to
control expenditures without compromising quality. Medicare home health has
been the subject of considerable research, but the actual practice of home
health care has not been extensively examined. This study will analyze
"episodes" of care under the Medicare home health benefit, assess the actual
practice of care, the extent to which there is variation in practice between
acute and long-term patients, and the factors that account for that variation.
This study will also examine decision-making processes between patients,
providers and physicians. What takes place during a visit and between visits as
"actual practice" has never been measured. Furthermore, the function of
decision-making by various parties has not been observed in "actual practice."
This effort to understand issues surrounding regional and practice variations
of home health care delivery will aid the Department and the industry in
combating fraud and abuse, as well as contribute valuable data to a future
prospective payment system.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Floyd Brown (Floyd.Brown@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
Robert Schlenker, University of Colorado Center for Health Policy Research, Denver,
CO |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
August 2001 |
PURPOSE: This project, co-sponsored by ASPE and
CMS's Office of Research and Demonstrations (ORD), is an evaluation of the
District of Columbia's 1115 waiver demonstration. The District's waiver is the
first approved demonstration to integrate acute and long-term care services for
SSI eligible children with disabilities in a single capitated payment system.
The study analyzed enrollment data and documented the experiences of the
District, the health plan, providers, and children and their families. The
study will be used to inform both state and federal policy makers who
increasingly regard managed care as a means of containing growing health care
expenditures. FINDINGS/RESULTS: In brief, the program concludes
that the capitated model tested in the Demonstration is not viable, in part
because the population of special needs children in the District is too small
to protect a plan against severe financial losses. Despite a proposal by DC
Medicaid to add stop-loss protection, the program announced that it will not
enter the waiver re-competition.
|
CONTACT PERSON |
Gavin Kennedy (Gavin.Kennedy@hhs.gov) |
|
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR |
David Kidder, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA |
|
COMPLETION DATE |
January 2000 |
REPORTS AVAILABLE |
Evaluation of the District of Columbia's Demonstration Program, "Managed Care System for Disabled and S | |