ECONOMIC SECURITY RISK FACTOR 5. EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BEGINNING AND ENDING OF A POVERTY EPISODE

Events that trigger the beginning or ending of a poverty episode indicate an increased or decreased likelihood of future dependence.

Table ECON 5a. Percent of First Poverty Episode Beginnings Associated with Specific Events

  Spell Began Spell Began Spell Began
  1973 - 1979 1980 - 1985 1986 - 1991

First birth to an unmarried, non-cohabitating mother

4.2 5.8 7.3
First birth to other circumstances

2.3

4.5

2.3

Second (or higher order) birth 9.2 10.2 17.9
Divorce/separation 10.9 16.2 14.6
Mother's work hours decreased by more than 500 hours 12.5 21.4 28.6
Other adults' work hours decreased by more than 500 hours, but no change in family structure 29.0 27.6 27.7
Other adults' work hours decreased by more than 500 hours, and a change in family structure 24.6 22.9 16.3
Householder acquired work limitation 13.9 17.2 23.7
Other transfer income dropped by $1,000 or more (in 1996$) 5.9 3.5 2.9
Changed state of residence 7.5 10.0 8.0

Note: Events are defined to be neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive. Work limitation is defined as a self-reported physical or nervous condition that limits the type of work or the amount of work the respondent can do.

Source: Unpublished data from the PSID, 1968 - 1992.

Table ECON 5b. Percent of First Poverty Episode Endings Associated with Specific Events

  Spell Ended Spell Ended Spell Ended
  1973 - 1979 1980 - 1985 1986 - 1991
Mother married or acquired cohabitor 14.2 14.0 11.5
Children under 18 no longer present 2.0 1.3 4.3
Mother's work hours increased by more than 500 hours 19.8 22.5 21.1
Other adults' work hours increased by more than 500 hours, but no change in family structure 23.7 29.5 22.5
Other adults' work hours increased by more than 500 hours, and a change in family structure 12.1 8.5 8.1
Householder no longer reports work limitation 14.3 19.1 20.1
Other transfer income increased by $1,000 or more (in 1996$) 4.2 5.3 3.8
Changed state of residence 8.9 14.0 9.5

Note: Events are defined to be neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive. Work limitation is defined as a self-reported physical or nervous condition that limits the type of work or the amount of work the respondent can do.

Source: Unpublished data from the PSID, 1968 - 1992.

ECONOMIC SECURITY RISK FACTOR 6. INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY

The extent to which parental poverty is associated with poverty of their children as adults illustrates a significant risk to current and future dependence.

Economic Risk Factor #6:  Intergenerational Poverty

Table ECON 6. Poverty Transitions Between Childhood and Adulthood

  Usually Poor as Child and Usually Poor as Adult Never Poor as Child and Ever Poor as Adult
White 9.8 10.2
Black 26.4 26.2

Note: "Usually Poor as Child and Usually Poor as Adult" measures the percent of children who were poor 51-100 percent of childhood who were also poor 51-100 percent of adulthood. "Never Poor as Child and Ever Poor as Adult" measures the percent of children who were never poor during childhood who were ever poor during adulthood. The table reads 9.8 percent of children who were usually poor during childhood (51-100 percent) were themselves usually poor during their observed adult years. Numbers are calculated for adults age 27 to 35 years in the 1988 PSID.

Source: Corcoran, M., "Rags to Rags: Poverty and Mobility in the United States," Annual Review of Sociology, 21:237-6, 1995.

ECONOMIC SECURITY RISK FACTOR 7. PRE-TRANSFER AND POST-TRANSFER POVERTY RATES

Trends in the pre- and post-transfer rates of poverty show the anti-poverty effectiveness of social security and the major means-tested assistance program benefits.

{short description of image}

Note: The pre-transfer rate measures poverty in terms of cash income (only) before all transfers. The official rate measures it in terms of cash income plus social security and means-tested cash transfers. The post-transfer rate measures poverty after adding not only social security and means-tested cash transfers but also the market value of food and housing benefits plus taxes (including the refundable EITC as well as Federal payroll and income taxes); it does not include the fungible value of Medicare and Medicaid.

Table ECON 7. Antipoverty Effectiveness of Cash and Near-Cash Transfers for All Persons in Families with Related Children Under 18, Selected Fiscal Years

  1979 1983 1989 1993 1994 1995
Total Population (in thousands) 133,435 132,123 135,430 144,551 145,814 146,227
Percent of Persons Removed from Poverty Due to:          
Social Insurance (other than Social Security) 4.4 6.9 3.4 4.2 3.8 3.5
Social Security 9.1 5.9 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.1
Means-Tested Cash 8.2 3.5 5.1 5.8 6.5 6.6
Food and Housing Benefits 16.5 8.7 11.7 10.2 11.6 12.5
EITC and Fed. Payroll and Income Taxes -1.7 -5.8 -2.8 2.3 4.1 6.6
             
Total Percent of Pre-Transfer Poor Removed            
from Poverty by All Transfers 36.6 19.1 23.9 28.9 32.6 35.2
             
Poverty Rate (in percent):            
Cash Income Before Transfers (pre-transfer) 16.6 21.9 18.6 22.3 21.4 20.0
Plus Social Ins. (other than Social Security) 15.8 20.4 18.0 21.4 20.6 19.3
Plus Social Security 14.3 19.1 16.8 20.0 19.2 18.1
Plus Means-Tested Cash Transfers (official poverty rate) 12.9 18.4 15.8 18.7 17.8 16.8
Plus Food and Housing Benefits 10.2 16.5 13.6 16.4 15.3 14.3
Plus EITC, less Fed. Payroll & Income Taxes (post-trans.) 10.5 17.7 14.1 15.9 14.4 13.0
             
Total Reduction in Poverty Rate 6.1 4.2 4.5 6.4 7.0 7.0
             
Note: EITC = Earned Income Tax Credit

Source: Congressional Budget Office tabulations. Additional calculations by DHHS.

Table of Contents Next