Personal and Family Challenges to the Successful Transition from Welfare to Work

By
Krista Olson and LaDonna Pavetti
The Urban Institute
May 17, 1996

For the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
and the
Administration for Children and Families

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Time limits, increasing employment and training participation requirements, and strict economic sanctions for non-compliance with program expectations, all increase the importance of engaging a broader share of the AFDC caseload in employment or employment-related activities. Over time, these policy changes will require states and local welfare offices to develop strategies to engage welfare recipients who have traditionally been exempted from participation in education or training activities, as well as other long-term recipients, in welfare-to-work programs. This paper is the first of a series of papers that will examine the magnitude of this challenge and identify potential options for helping this group of families find and maintain employment.

In an attempt to identify the percentage of the caseload that is likely to need more assistance than traditional welfare-to-work programs generally provide, this paper examines the following questions:

  1. What are the types of personal and family challenges that may hinder a welfare recipient's movement toward productive and successful employment?
  2. What do we know about the prevalence of each of these potential barriers to employment among the welfare population?
  3. When the presence of multiple barriers is taken into account, what fraction of the current AFDC caseload is likely to experience at least one potential barrier to employment?
  4. What do we know about the relationship between the presence of these potential barriers to employment and actual work experience?
  5. What are the implications of these findings for the design and deliver of welfare-to- work programs?

To provide a comprehensive picture, we utilize existing literature, such as evaluations of welfare-to-work demonstration programs, informal surveys of direct service providers, analyses of large-scale national surveys, and case record reviews, which we supplement with a primary analysis of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY). Later papers will examine the characteristics and structure of programs already addressing these issues, develop a set of alternative intervention models to promote sustained employment among those who would otherwise fail to achieve employment goals, and design a multi-site demonstration project to test promising intervention strategies.

Key Findings

Download a copy of the report (problems.zip 61 Kb) in a compressed format.


Where to?

Top of page

Home Pages:
Human Services Policy (HSP)
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Last updated 9/1/00